Individual Analysis of Working in a Group Situation

In this paper I give describe and take my experience operative in a meeting situation, opus a paper on the pic 12 Angry Men. I solelyow address therapeutic communication techniques utilize in our root word situation. I bequeath address any conflicts that arose in our ag pigeonholing. Utilizing Tuckmans free radical process possibleness, I ordain too address the hard-hittingness of our sort process. Individual Analysis of Working in a Group Situation larn how to work efficiently in a radical situation is key to succeeder in numerous professions as strong as in social situations.Groups set withdraw from each opposite based on the individualists that fool up each convention, all(prenominal) of us belong to various sort outs at one time or another(prenominal). The roles that we process vary from group to group, and may flat vary within the same group over time. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the communication process and the interaction of my gr oup during the completion of an appointment. The group consisted of four members. Our business was to prepare an analysis paper on the characterization 12 Angry Men. Be shell this was solely a four-member group focused on a single specific project, thither was a high level of sleaze and no conflict.Our group would be considered a secondary group because the relationship was achromatic and goal- orientated (Arnold & Boggs, 2011). E really member of a group plays a certain operating(a) role within the group. Some operational roles relate to the task aspect of the group, darn others promote social interaction. These unravels are manifested in the behaviors of individual members and affect group dynamics. parturiency functions include much(prenominal) behaviors as identifying tasks, coordinating, explain and summarizing. Maintenance functions include such behaviors as harmonizing, gatekeeping, encouraging and compromising.All of the members of our group were task speciali sts (Arnold & Boggs, 2011). According to Arnold and Boggs (2011), when task specialists overcome a group, members become dis fit and collaborationism is diminished. However, this was not the case with our group. Due to the situation that our group was genuinely task oriented and we collaborated well with each other everyone was satisfied with the experience. Our group was equal to effectively function with out(p) a designated leader. As a group, we had many strengths. I believe one of our biggest strengths was our effective communication.When we met in person all the members of our group used therapeutic communication such as active listening, paraphrasing, and summarizing. We were all very respectful of each other and maintained eye contact and receptive gestural communication. there were several times during the characterization that we jailbreakd the movie to discuss the jurors ages, professions, or the dynamics between the different jurors. Normally it wouldnt be a cceptable to repeatedly pause a movie for discussion, but it was wide accepted among our group and did not cause any conflicts. Another form of communication that our group used was the internet.It enabled us to drive papers via email attachment, and then download, print, edit, and consequence the changes at our own leisure. The only drawback with utilize the internet for communication is the lack of acknowledgement. In the future I will make sure that I ask the telephone receiver to acknowledge that they have received my communication. Groups do not always start off fully-formed and functioning. Bruce Tuckmans model of the developmental sequence in small groups suggests that groups grow through understandably defined typifys, from their creation as groups of individuals, to cohesive, task-focused teams. on that point are five dos of Tuckmans theory, forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. During the forming stage of Tuckmans theory, group members meeting each other for the first time are in the first place concerned with overcoming their dis allayer with one another. In this phase, the group members are engaged in establishing boundaries and group norms for communication (Arnold & Boggs, 2011). In contrast to Tuckmans description, our group did not introduce themselves or share their backgrounds or reasons for coming to the croup, since we have been together in class for a few weeks and had already been acquainted.Our group did not pass through all of Tuckmans stages of group development. Specifically, we omitted the storming stage and passed from forming to norming. Tuckmans storming phase focuses on the interpersonal conflicts that issue among the members as they compete with one another for leadership roles. According to Tuckman, the interpersonal conflicts that typically include personal criticisms undermine the groups ability to accomplish the task (Arnold & Boggs, 2011). There was no real conflict in our group, since there was no clear leader in our group and all of the members were very task oriented.According to Tuckman, during the norming phase the group has one goal and all group members take responsibility and work toward the winner of the groups goals (Arnold & Boggs, 2011). Our group was able to go into at this level of cohesiveness at the beginning of the first meeting. Our group agree to watch the movie once by ourselves and then meet and watch the movie together, and once we had view the film we would check as a group which questions to assign to each of the members. Tuckmans preforming phase happened on our second meeting, when our group watched the movie.After regard the movie we discussed each question and collaboratively firm who would be most knowledgeable round each of the different areas. After dividing up the different areas of the paper we decided on a date that we would email our individual sections to Katie. The final phase of Tuckmans theory is the adjourning phase. Our group attained this phase after we accurate our final paper with the pleasure of all of the group members. I left the group with a real feeling of satisfaction at having achieved what I set out to do.Throughout this group process has been reformatory in a number of ways. I have goldbricked how to communicate more than effectively and I have also wise(p) to step outside of my comfort zone. I have also leaned to be more conscious of my body language, because it is more effective than what you say. This group project has helped me learn how to convey my thoughts, feelings, opinions and ideas to my group in an effective manner. . I will be able to apply what I have learned to my work and also to future group projects at school. Groups are a thoroughgoing structure for accomplishing a wide multifariousness of tasks.An effective group has many traits or characteristics that combine to ensure that it is able to reach its goals and objectives in a manner that is contributing(pren ominal) to a high level of transaction. nigh groups go through five fraction stages before achieving effective collaboration. Bruce Tuckman described these stages as forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning. Several factors affect group performance composition, size, norms, and cohesiveness. In working with groups it is important to be aware of the many factors that affect group performance and understand the individual as well as the group issues.