Integrity in The Crucible :: Essay on The Crucible

?What is left when honor is lost?? Publilius Syrus quote, though dating from c B.C., still seems pertinent to our era (Quotations). Many people still feel that once integrity is lost they argon nothing and many are automatic to stand up to keep their integrity. Without integrity, we are nothing. During the time that Arthur Miller wrote his most famous play, The Crucible, aboveboard men and women are accused of having Communist leanings. Their whole lives are ruined in a short amount of time because they refuse to compromise themselves by selling out their friends. Miller tries to make a asseveration about these unfair trials by comparing them to the Salem witch-hunts and trials of 1692. The main protagonist of his play is a man named John monitor who is accused of witchcraft just stands up to maintain his name and his honor, even though he is hanged for it. During the H.U.A.C. trials some took stands for their beliefs with the knowledge of possibly being shunned by society. Kno wing this, instead of taking the cowards mien and giving the names of their friends, they refuse to tell the committee anything in the same way that John Proctor stands up against a court that is ruining the lives of innocent people. In The Crucible, a few of the townspeople speak out against the injustice of the magistrates. These include John Proctor, Giles Corey, his wife Martha, Rebecca Nurse, Elizabeth Proctor, and even Reverend John Hale. Proctor refuses to commit up his integrity and sign his name to a false confession. He thought it was enough admitting to a lie, but he can not give way to sign a confession when others had died for refusing to give the courts what they want. Because it is my name Because I cannot have another in my life Because I lie and sign myself to lies Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul, leave me my name exclaims Proctor (886). Giles Corey is being pressed to death f or not giving the court the name of an innocent person. Even to the end he refuses to give in. Great stones they lay upon his federal agency until he plead aye or nay. They say he give them but two words. More weight, he says. And died, explains Elizabeth (883).