Language and Culture in an Immigrant Society :: Cultural Identity Essays

The professor of my linguistics anthropology course this year, stepped up to the podium on the branch day of class, and surprised us all with his feelings regarding wrangle. He began by telling us that he specializes in human misery, perhaps insinuating voice communication is a source of misery. Dr. Song is a Korean immigrant and the sounds of his own spoken language repulses him. Growing up in modern society America has do him cringe at the sound of his native tongue. It is this same native language of Korean that my professor falls back into when he is made flighty by an English speaking person leaning in adjacent to him and squinting up his face expecting not to understand what will devolve out of his mouth before he even opens it. It is as if the defeat and impatience he has confronted in people has fostered a hatred for the start of him that is foreign.   Michael nutrient agar, a leading theorist on modern linguistics, has proposed a rationality for th is regression. In looking at the elusive idea of culture we protrude that the content is ever changing. It is a continual process wholeness that Agar narrates is not something those people have its something that happens to you. My professor functiond an example of cardinal types of drivers to demonstrate the different reactions to the complications that arise with culture. These two drivers will be called the first and second driver. The first driver embodies the number one type and the second, the right driver. He uses the situation of traffic congestion to put these types into perspective. Imagine a driver during traffic congestion. The number one type will say to himself, The system is causing this inconvenience, because it is always like this. To a number one type, it is this immutable truth that is the cause of any obstacles. This truth can be applied to almost anything in a society where we are ring by reproducible images and experiences, which grants permi ssion to use stereotypes. The problem (the traffic congestion) is caused by a thing out there and is objectified.   But there is a second driver, the good driver. This driver does not objectify the situation and use the accepted truth.