A Policy Analysis Report Assignment

Your NameInstructor s nameCourseDateNo nipper leftover BehindFive years ago chairperson pubic hair signed into law the landmark No Child Left Behind deed (NCLB . The turn was the President s superior national indemnity initiative and signified a great federalisation of prevalent teaching . Passed by Congress with a steady bipartisan mass it was meant to reduce the litany of problems facing public reproduction . Where it seemed the states had failed the federal government was willing to go , in an twain out refurbishing of the principles governing the nation s public schools . The substance article of faith of the Act was to improve teaching method standards by holding States responsible for the level of education of their students and by providing change magnitude incentives much(prenominal) as federal contr ibutions and flexibility to states who could show themselves accountableOn kinsfolk 30 , 2007 , the Act is up for reauthorization and mounters and naysayers alike are culmination forth to converse the Act s most grievous measures . With a Democratic majority in Congress and Senator Edward Kennedy at the transport of the Senate body in control of education the Act could be up for pregnant revisions . The aim of this is to analyze the extent to which the policy has met it s objectives and to discuss where the Act may be headed in the futureNCLB is the revitalization and re-organization of the Secondary genteelness Act (ESEA , which was passed by President Lyndon tinston in 1964 . ESEA sought to athletic supporter state and local education authorities provide their students with a higher quality of education from kindergarten by means of to grade cardinal by providing greater federal support . Although Johnston s Act had been through changes in previous administrations at no time was it to start out such a thor! ough over-haul as with the government of scrub (Gonzalez , Hamilton Stecher ,.

1While President Clinton had attempted to revise ESEA , his initiative was bogged down by republican opposition in congressional education committals generally controlled by the opposing party . Bush s strategy be upon these committees and in the end it was the committees who took his vision and drafted it into legislation . Bush enlisted two important figures within the committees , Republican George Miller and Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy , who would a shortstop time later become leader of the Senate committee ascendent the bi llAt the time of the bill s initiation the committee chairmen of second , the health , Education , Labor and Pensions committee of the Senate were two Republicans , Jeffords and Boehner , both of which support the bill . In addition , the bipartisan support for NCLB was to a large extent the result of Democratic lobbyist sandlike Kress , who was a critical player in the drafting of NCLB . Borjian , Conrad and Luna adduce that , Kress was slavish in putting to impersonateher the bipartisan encourage bottom the bill pulling Democratic lawmakers Ted Kennedy , George Miller , and John Boehner into the prexy s court (56 . The committee approved the bill on marching music 8th and the full Senate and the House approved it a...If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper