Twelve angry men

Put yourself on trial, where 11 jurymans off of 12 vote culpable. Although you atomic number 18 innocent, and the whiz man in the instrument panel who votes not guilty has comely doubt for your guilt. Your life is in twelve untamed mens hands. You gutter hardly defend yourself. Its up to the jurors to interpret the terminology in the testimonies to find the truth. In twelve Angry Men, by Reginald blush wine the main factors that create logical doubt for the jurors to vista at were; the cleaning char crossways the street, the problems with the knife, and the old man who lived in the building. First, a charwoman testifies against the boy who lives directly across the street. Her window is parallel to the boys who is now on trial. She claimed she had gone to bed intimately 11 oclock. She was tossing and turning for near an hour, because it was a hot night. When she casually looked out he window. She had seen the boy stab his father. The problems with this testimony be explained to the other jurors by juror #4 who points out the woman wears specs. He also wore glasses and explained you didnt wear them when you go to sleep. When she nonchalantly looked out the window, it probably wouldnt sire been clear what she was looking at.

several(prenominal) other thing that capacity have blurred her pot would be the passing el train. She had to look threw the windows of it, to see the boy. The woman across the street looked by the windows of the last two cars of the el and maxim the body ancestry pg. 143. Remember that she had been tossing and turning for an hour. Dont you depend she would have been half torpid and not sure of what she had seen?... If you deprivation to impersonate a wide essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper